www.public4you.fora.pl

njlpkhgea

,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Common level of significance test of grouped data three: Cpd Analysis

Group 'in the treatment level convergence effect from top to bottom is based on the poor by the good order of Vice, the calculated Cpd is positive, the next sample dried jujube -77 excellent overall efficiency. Value of l calculated Qpd hook negative. Boil-like vehicles that effect: Her overall) compared with the overall Cpd sample analysis can also be valued by calculating the elm draw statistical conclusions of statistical test to calculate N one-three n..) t? -= one case a! type II ::!=:,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]!::! AU V3 (3330-1) _-4.64> 2.58P 2.58Pd0.01, it can be considered Armillarisin tangled tangled with the efficacy of different antibiotic. Armillarisin orderly orderly group was superior antibiotic group (down from the previous level when the effect is effective from good to bad by holding out in order . Cpd compared between the two groups is effective for the positive group) 3. Cpd comparative analysis of multiple samples of clinical work, and sometimes to compare the efficacy of the two groups on the p 』statistically significant difference in whether it is necessary to compare multiple groups (twist 1 of 3 in a hospital down rating A, B,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], c three different drugs on the efficacy in patients with a disease-ho, clinical observation of Ge Gao Table 3 (1), (2),[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], (4), (6) listed below. bad 3 les sacs Chiru three drugs on treatment of bone cpd contrast Ji-calculated failure prayer group in this case the level of group 3, the information is appropriate to compare multiple samples (i analysis. 1 point calculations also lI the comparative value of each group Cpa. steps are as follows 3-11 Comparison of the group and obtained the first column from top to bottom the total number of cumulative cases and down line, sub-cut off the feet written in Table 3 (3) (5) (7 ) (9) column. l2 calculated each grade (3) (8) out of product and (2) '9) write out the difference between the product of Table 3 【10) column; (5) (8) column and the product ( 4) (9) the difference between the product of writing the column in Table 3 (11) column; (7) '8) 『bad product and I (6) (9) the difference between the product of writing the column in Table 3 (12) column. 1.3 were obtained (10) (11) (12) out of the total. Comparison of the three groups is the value of their cpd. cpd each group the sum should be 0, otherwise the calculation is wrong. In this example: A drug group (Tu = 734.B Medicines q = a 75,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], C drug group Cpac-a 659, three of and for the O; i by 3-2 against the Xi of calculating the correct type t4) find Kim in pit measurement is worth a pit x Accountancy conclusion.: = was ... ... ... Equation (4) in the cpd to compare each group (: pd value for the number of patients in each group, N for the cases of casual interest, n. i-level for the group of patients London's totals. in this case X2-3 (270-1) 734.270. a 20. a 51 a 55 a 144 100 'ten on the .]:。- 5l O- 05 * it still can not draw A, B, C three drugs are differences in the efficacy of tough conclusions.