www.public4you.fora.pl

argvEFd023

imperfect wiring system has resulted in a deranged habituation to violence and war since the beginnings of "civilization" and history. As to the before hunter-gatherer period, when women had a voice in decision-making,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], we are in the dingy. Keep in mind that it is men who have logged always the events of the past. Would they be prejudiced?
Furthermore, one imbalance in their sexual identity--brought about when they unceremoniously overthrew women--has reasoned them to rely aboard the bigger-is-better syndrome (a strategy that dogs--wisely--gave up long ago).
When one's sexual identity--really the core of our personhood--if only in equilibrium,of sorts curious entities tin occur. That excplains their proclivity to wake up and ascertain themselves by campaign.
More alarming namely their insecurity and panic. This leads men apt prevaricate and cover up their errors and weaknesses prefer than study from them. Their addictive accustomed of bailing every other out--government money bailing out corporate greed--is counterproductive, counterintuitive, for well as fake.
These cover-ups or bail outs, if of Wall Street or Detroit (or the U.K. saving face for Bush in the Iraq misadventure) only prolong the catastropic descent of the man template into disaster.
Incompetence is rewarded, simply for males work both ends. They're in dictate. Men managing men--providing oversight--can't work if there's not foresight to begin with.
Men's blind ambition--to keep everybody in the dark--was successful until Mother Nature caught up with them and slapped them down with universal warming.
Only women could question men's foresight and competence. And they've been in resumption from 10,000 years of enforced subjugation and harassment. It was men who judged that women were incompetent 2,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],000 years antecedent. After that, if a female questioned a man's honesty, rationality or virility, she was demonstrating her jealousy,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], weakness and emotionalism.
Which is why the special UN body needs to have a bulk of women (certified female: no Albrights, Thatchers or Merkels need apply--these women demonstrate a amazing affinity for calculating favor men, especially while it comes to warfare) so that they can eventually bring this nightmarish time of history to a near.
The male template, unbalanced from the beginning, has outlived its usefullness. Like the failed Detroit models it's been producing for forty years, it needs to add the scrap pile of history.