www.public4you.fora.pl

john4525

ree
has given rise to a boundless ocean of discussionwhich has left us little save the option of choosing which
theory or theories we will follow. The personality of Shakespere isperhapsthe only thing in which critics
will allow us to believe without controversy; but upon everything elseeven down to the authorship of plays
there is more or less of doubt and uncertainty. Of Socrates we know as little as the contradictions of Plato and
Xenophon will allow us to know. He was one of the dramatis personae in two dramas as unlike in principles
as in style. He appears as the enunciator of opinions as different in their tone as those of the writers who have
handed them down. When we have read Plato or Xenophonwe think we know something of Socrates; when
we have fairly read and examined bothwe feel convinced that we are something worse than ignorant.
It has been an easyand a popular expedientof late yearsto deny the personal or real existence of men and
things whose life and condition were too much for our belief. This system--which has often comforted the
religious scepticand substituted the consolations of Strauss for those of the New Testament--has been of
incalculable value to the historical theorists of the last and yilai:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
christian louboutin outlet
On the Makaloa Mat LondonJack Published ccaafjkp[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]