www.public4you.fora.pl

njlpkhgea

,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
US-European differences in income distribution policy and its causes

Mr Robert Kagan has deep sharply pointed out: rules, self-restraint in the stage of cross-border consultation and cooperation. In other words, Europe itself has entered the park after the period of human history European countries while social welfare is complete, the gap smaller, but high unemployment, weak economic growth. Does this mean that Europe's income distribution policy failure of the social welfare system? This, I know two things: first, the social welfare system, a policy of equal distribution of income has brought prosperity to the European people, civilized, harmonious and stable , the advantages of such a system and policy flaws with it as obvious. High unemployment, weak economic growth is not the root of the welfare system, income distribution policy of equality, but in the actual implementation of the system and policies will be absolute. In fact, capitalism in Europe to study the adjustment or reform is not to abandon the social welfare system and the policy of equal distribution of income, just follow the the loss of the ability to work to safeguard the livelihood of people, Second, European countries do not change the existing welfare system and income distribution policies carried out under the framework of the adjustment has paid off. European economic growth accelerated in recent years, the unemployment rate declined. Since 1999, the euro zone economy grew by 8.6%, the unemployment rate fell to 8.9%, while economic growth over the same period in Sweden is as high as 12.5%, the unemployment rate fell to 5.4%. @ This shows that, without changes to the existing welfare system and income distribution policy framework is also fully address the high unemployment and weak economic growth issues. Therefore, the existing social welfare system in Europe and the income distribution policy is not to be abandoned. As the American scholar Paul Samuelson said, @