www.public4you.fora.pl

90nike5657fv

Private ownership of land is the fundamental way to solve rural issues

Abstract: Malthusian view that population growth is always faster than the growth of subsistence, so the community will always reach the population saturation and stagnation. Pei Xiaolin that must use the Ricardo believes that Western Europe from traditional agriculture to modern industry North believes that Pei Xiaolin that exists between North and Ricardo is a paradox, because the more efficient economic organization, the economy, the faster the Malthusian model to achieve the limits allowed by the model at a standstill so the North can not stand the test of history is a story . Pei Xiaolin Malthus in his theoretical analysis of the improved situation in the country after a large population that fewer people and more objective conditions of the decision a the performance of this historical trend. This paper argues that the Malthusian model of traditional society has a good explanatory power, but it is the premise of technical change, so can not be explained by the traditional society to modern society's transformation. Can really explain the transformation of social structure in Western Europe, it is criticized by Pei Xiaolin North model. Pei Xiaolin the The so-called The key problem is not China's agriculture to sustain food production but to improve were To solve the problem lies in China's agriculture to implement this measure is far from a panacea, but no such measure is totally unacceptable. Keywords: Malthus Ricardo North Pei Xiaolin private ownership of land I search on the site information on the relationship between population and land, accidentally discovered Mr. Pei Xiaolin (Netherlands tired University of Dayton Law Yuan and the Department of History, Economics, University of Lund, Sweden) and long paper A problem Mr. Pei with a He applied the theory of densely populous country situation, that there is a determined by objective conditions to solve the population problem of existence of the right choice. I thought that, for decades, China adopted the ownership of land and now the system of land sharing, are formed under certain conditions, the special system, which fundamentally against human nature, so agriculture is bound to enter dead end. Way to solve the fundamental way to China's agriculture is private ownership of land,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], allowing trading. Of those who oppose the privatization of land articles, I rarely have patience and read on. Fortunately, Mr. Pei's article on the theoretical rather than empirical emphasis, and I very much like service is the Since the same theory (Malthus) is applied to the same object (the Chinese land system), but reached the opposite conclusion, which is necessary to find out, the question whether the defects out of the theory, or the fact that in the specific application to? Second, the value of target selection errors a simple historical fact is that people are economic men. Thousands of years, hundreds of millions of people have never been to feed the rulers, but the people feed themselves. Any farmers do not need to consider how to support the country's population, but only need to consider how to support their wife and children. So no one care about the Over the years the ruling Communist ideology has a big mistake, that is, it depends on if people across the country to feed the same fear of the sites are fully put to the people, the people themselves will not feed themselves. Therefore, under Chinese rule, But for now, China's grain had passed, urban residents rarely worried about their ability to buy less food, more rarely, some farmers worry that not enough food produced in their own consumption. The problem is that grain oversupply, prices have been stagnant, the main concern of Chinese farmers household income is too low to maintain a decent life. Therefore, Third,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the improved model Malthus Malthus that population growth is always faster than the growth of subsistence, so the community will always reach saturation and stagnation of population, then made a pessimistic outlook on human forecasts. Malthusian theory contains three basic assumptions, namely the food necessary for human survival, the second is the limited nature of the land and the third is a natural growth of population trends. These three assumptions are no doubt correct, because they are rooted in Mr. Pei found Malthusian theory in his argument, by assume key conclusions need to use solid economic theory must be based on Mr. Pei believes that the decision of the natural law of diminishing returns of labor is the Any age has its particular production technology, Introduction of the , AY says that the total grain supply, when NS = AY, the population reached saturation, the society fall into the trap of population equilibrium. This formula is an improvement of the Malthusian model. Four out of the population on how to trap human Mr. Pei to see the debate, immigrants from Western Europe to establish the American society (U.S., Canada) and the Australian community (Australia, New Zealand), several hundred years has been no fall into the so-called For now, though many countries (society) population of the trap is still struggling, but as a whole, humanity has gradually acquired the means to climb out of the trap population. This raises a question: Since the establishment of the Malthusian theory of To answer this important question, in fact, economic historians spent a lot of energy. Neoclassical economics School North in the The rise of the market economy in Western Europe has developed an organization conducive to economic growth and the system key to economic growth in Western Europe. Mr. Pei Quedui North theories agree with,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], he borrowed Ricardo's thesis that the stability of a society of food remaining from the traditional agricultural society to modern industrial society, restructuring of the The remaining food is grown or imported. Mr. Pei believes that it is the belief that the British Ricardo's theory, developed to allow imports of cheaper food from abroad, the bill was able to solve the social transformation in the demand for food, and completed by the agricultural society to industrial society, the structure of conversion. Mr. Pei believes that in classical economics and neo-classical economics to the existence of a paradox: the North in accordance with principles of neoclassical economics, efficient economic organization led to the existence and development is the key to sustained economic growth in Western Europe; and under classical economics, the more efficient a society, the more able to produce food surplus, the more you will stimulate population growth, the population quickly reached saturation point, leading to social stagnation. Mr. Pei believes that India, China and other populous countries, precisely because of its ancient social structure more efficient, was able to feed their huge population; but also the social structure because of their high efficiency, but also make them the earliest and most profound into a Malthusian trap and can not extricate themselves. Mr. Pei this assertion, Mr. Pei believes that the British also trapped in the Malthusian trap, but being able to import cheap food from abroad, which makes the British out of Malthus inhibited, resulting in the Industrial Revolution. Import cheap food from the point of view, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Singapore, the population is clearly a small country than India, China and other populous countries have an unparalleled advantage, because less food remaining abroad will be able to meet in small countries with economies in transition the additional demand for food . Implication, the world's smaller countries,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], easy to implement the industrial revolution, to complete a structural transformation. Five, Mr. Pei of the densely populous country in the situation that the On this basis, Mr. Pei believes that if China rural full implementation of the privatization of land, will reduce the total grain output, to the agricultural society to industrial society result in greater obstacles. I think that, although Ricardo with his necessary and sufficient conditions We can use a lot of historical facts show that food-surplus is not a sufficient condition for the transformation of social structure: the so-called Chinese history, governance But it did not stimulate agricultural surplus to industrial society On the other hand, food-surplus is not a necessary condition for transformation of social structure. We can use this principle Ricardo found himself to refute this claim. difficult when only enough account of the food instead of more expensive food. However, under certain environmental conditions, such as suitable grazing or hunting and fishing areas, meat, eggs, milk, fish, cheaper than food. Therefore, a pure food-producing society (or regions), even if no food left, you can also exchange of relatively inexpensive food and a higher standard of living (the Ricardian theory of comparative advantage.) In fact since the earliest development of the Dutch manufacturing sector, which in their own geographical advantages, the development of a professional production to achieve the structural transformation. So food-surplus is not a transition state structure More articles related to topics：

Louis Vuitton The Acura Rl - Cool And Confident_31

nike sale Quattro A1 In Testing_153

Tory Burch Outlet Key words