www.public4you.fora.pl

njlpkhgea

Discriminate ethics of euthanasia

Frustrated, or forced means. That from the conservation of health resources and reduce the burden on family economic well-being point of view to prove the death of technology and the law is reasonable, is human dignity, human values, social relations between people devastation and shock, no doubt is a violation of humanitarian. We do not oppose the way patients choose to die right eleven it is consistent with humanitarian principles, but against external forces is the direct cause of death I think that when we demonstrate from the ethical point of view the necessity of euthanasia must be based on the patient's will, the will of the patient truly independent, and only in the country prosperous, highly developed health care system, patients no longer worry about high medical bills when the feast is now possible. Then, the face of incurable and painful dying, how they do through the final stages of life? Contemporary Western experience has shown that for modern medical technology can not cure the terminally ill patients, the psychological care and comfort than expensive but does not help any of the drugs, with little success of any technical complexity of the rescue are important-this is the I hospice's English name is Hospice care in Hong Kong said, palliative care in Taiwan said, its meaning is dying patients physical, psychological, social and other aspects of concern and care, so that to reduce physical pain, eliminating the fear of dying before the psychological, anxiety and anxiety, to let dying patients in the final stages of life, their mental and physical maximum warmth and comfort, to fully experience the beauty of life, peace, serenity to spend the final stages of life. Hospice originated in the 20th century, 60 years, Dr. Sanders of the United Kingdom reviewed and summarized his life in the nursing career, that ultimately can not save the patient's life, but it can alleviate the suffering of the patient's body and mind of grief. She said that, in our patients ask for euthanasia if someone, it means we did not do its part. Sanders firmly opposed to the legalization of euthanasia. She also said that our society is still not the poor that we can not provide time, love and money to help people survive death. For those trapped in the pain of fear and sadness, and we have a ways to relieve their suffering, we do not need to kill them. For the legalization of voluntary euthanasia would be an irresponsible act, it will prevent us for the elderly, disabled and dying really respect and responsibility. In 1967 she set up in London, the world's first hospice of St Kitts, I dying for those who provide comfort and care, helping them to control or eliminate pain,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], overcome the fear of death. Since then, other countries and regions in the world followed suit, hospice has developed rapidly. In China, Tianjin Medical University was established in July 1988 of the first hospice center. In the same year, Shanghai is also the birth of one by one I Nanhui hospice care hospitals. Followed by Beijing, Shanghai, Wuhan, Qingdao and other places have appeared a number known as the L1 January 1998, Li Ka-shing invested in Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College established the first hospice in Mainland China. Because hospice care to better reflect the social and humanitarian, so easily accepted by people. Therefore, to develop To interpretation: 【1】 Chang. Euthanasia debate and the legal evaluation of the third line of U】. Chinese Criminal Law Journal. 2002,3. 【2】 Sun Hsiao-chih, euthanasia ethical reflection, net, end of life choice and dignity. Sun Hsiao-chih. Euthanasia ethical reflection, IJ], History and Philosophy at National Taiwan University reported, 1997,2, 【3】 Chang. Euthanasia debate and the legal evaluation of the third route IJ] red state Criminal Science. 2002,3. 【4】 Li beam. I want to die 【N】 decent, Southern Weekend. 2003-06-26. 【5】 Zhu Xiaoxian. Euthanasia. Walk the edge of the legal and moral U】. News Digest. 2003,4. [6】 Li Xihe. Philosophy of Civil 【M】. Shanghai: Fudan University Press. 2000.192. 【7】 Rock n.. Of Government (Part II) 【M】, Yeqi Fang Qu Junong translation. Beijing: Commercial Press. 1964. P. 6. Mill f f8 John is n.. On Liberty】『M, Cheng Chonghua translation. Beijing: Commercial Press. 1959. No. 1O page. 【9】 Li beam. I want a decent die IN]. Southern Weekend. 2003-06-26. 【LO1