www.public4you.fora.pl

90nike5657fv

Not lead to customer credit card is stolen signature verification to bear responsibility for the supermarket you brush

Losses in the problem, to solve this problem through negotiation: If you can not be settled through negotiations, they can only solve by law: contract law with me on the unpaid commission Article 406 losses in the contract states: contract, due to the agent's willful misconduct or gross negligence caused the loss of the principal, the principal may seek compensation for losses That is gross negligence? You friend is relatively expensive to buy such goods store to buy not one, but in the stalls to buy. Can be considered a fault ÷ but she was in a business license (albeit false) of the stall to buy, but also obtain a credit card, and bought her own factory the same items. In view of this. It also does not think she has ---_-·--__. I did not check the signature card theft led to the customer to bear responsibility for the supermarket up the brush. 1I-__ · _l__ a judge: for convenience, I went to China Merchants Bank for a credit card, overdraft l million card number printed on the front of the card, and China Merchants Bank marks, but also with the same sound with my Chinese name Braille alphabet,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], cardholder signature panel on the back was to the wife keep the credit card I use? day, I received a call the wife, and said bag stolen credit cards are gone, they quickly called the bank report the loss or late unfortunately a step, credit card spending has more than 5,000 yuan by others, consumer sites for a supermarket, consumer signature Li Moumou signature So, I find the supermarket, asking them to bury bamboo mat, the supermarket said it was I lost my credit card, I was not their responsibility to ask: did not check the customer credit card theft led to the signature brush,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], supermarkets have to bear responsibility for it? Jiangsu Wang Liang Wang Liang readers: A supermarkets, as merchants, China Merchants Bank credit card, credit card holders in the consumer, shall, to the careful attention and review obligations, carefully check the consumer's signature and the credit card cardholder signature is the same, if the end to make careful review of obligations, resulting in stolen credit card to others brush, you can identify faults in the supermarket. Cheng Feng H should be compared with the civil liability of the fault system your credit card cardholders. And credit card with your name on the same Pinyin pronunciation Braille, and in the event of cardholder signature panel at the time of consumption to sign for the This case, careful review of obligations not entirely determined supermarket, there is no doubt that the fault, then, should bear full responsibility for the supermarket is it? Not necessarily,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], mainly to see whether there is fault of your own credit card shall keep, you will be credit card to his wife use, you can say that you take good care of the credit card fails to fulfill obligations. Lost and stolen credit card is also at fault: So. You should also own ... given the responsibility,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], of course, is the main reason for the fault of the supermarket, your own fault is a secondary culprit, supermarkets, credit card fraud should bear the main liability of the brush. Judge: According to the agreed post-retirement pre-retirement wealth index also constitute a crime of accepting bribes. _-_I-_ --- _ Lee served as a test of a Council officer, the company will send samples to the tests, Lee made it clear that if you do not give her 1 million But she is about to retire, in order to avoid trouble, to my company first issued IOUs, after her retirement, to receive: I had to do so. Recently, Lee, who retired I received a credit notes to which I ask: Does Lee Bribery? Jiangxi Wang Qin Wang Qin readers: Lee, the move also has Bribery: Bribery is the use of state for personnel his position to ask for other people's property or illegally accepting other people's property, seek benefits for others behavior. Contains the main body of the crime away from the (back) off for the staff ignored the home T-1 ~ because the country for people from the (back) after retirement, due to the formation of the original terms of the status of facilities did not completely disappear, it provided for the kind of bribery possible. Moreover, Lee is a retired before the use of his office to bribes. Supreme People's Court prior agreement with the trustees, in their acceptance of trustees of property after retirement. constitutes a crime, convicted and punished for taking bribes. On the other hand, the Supreme People's Procuratorate INSIDE & OUTSIDEOFCOURT59
More articles related to topics：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]