www.public4you.fora.pl

ghdhair100 · Wysłany: Sob 3:18, 12 Mar 2011 Temat postu: 美国《科学

美国《科学》杂志对有人告发方舟子抄袭剽窃的回复
以下英文文字是美国《科学》杂志对有人告发方舟子抄袭剽窃的回复（据说告发者不止肖传国一人），文中提及的中立翻译版本据说出自谢蕾之手。只是据说，有人留言提及谢蕾是新华社记者。没有查到翻译原文或可证明为谢蕾的身份及所译的证据。因此请慎重。本翻译与寻正的版本大同小异。自认为略微准确一些。Although I do not read or speak Chinese, I have had access to an English version of Fang’s article, translated by an independent source. 虽然我不懂中文，我能看到方文的英文版本。是一个中立（独立）方翻译的。We believe that Fang’s article would not be considered acceptable journalism in the United States. 我们相信方文在美国不会被认定为可接受的报道写作。He did not give the names of the researchers who carried out the research or the journal in which it was published, 他没有给出研究者或该文作者的名字，nor did he include quotes from other scientists.他也没有引述其他科学家的评论（评价）All these aspects would be essential for a journalistic article in a US publication.这些是美国出版物写作报道的基本要素。However, a charge of plagiarism would be difficult to uphold since Fang did say the work was performed by researchers at Princeton University, 但是指其剽窃，很难成控。既然方文确实提及该项工作由普林斯顿大学研究者所为。and–unless the translation I have is wrong–he neither implied that the work was his own by witing in the first person nor directly copied the language in the Science paper.另外，他没有用第1人称暗示研究是他本人所为，也没有直接复制科学杂志文章的措辞。除非我手上的中文版本有误。注：英文文字摘自寻正的的文章。可到古狗上去搜“寻正”
The secondary purpose is to show you how much traffic 038; visibility your articles are attracting for you.Some questions for you:How would you like to see these email reports improved?What additional information should we include in them?Is monthly the right frequency to send them or would like them more or less frequently?Does this email service lead you to really write and submit more articles or not so much?Would you like to see total # of clicks delivered to your website?

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]